ASMPT's Record Order Book Comes With a Handoff Problem
The AI packaging boom is real, but the memory leg has been pushed out—and the new CEO is asking investors to underwrite logic and photonics first.
0522.HK · Earnings Call · 2026-10-27
ASMPT's first earnings call under new Group CEO Bassel Haddad was, on the surface, a triumph: record group bookings, record TCB and SMT orders, record photonics revenue, and a book-to-bill of 1.69. But the detail underneath the headline is a company in the middle of a handoff. The AI infrastructure order wave is real; the memory leg that was supposed to anchor the next phase has been pushed to the right, and management is now asking investors to underwrite logic, panel-level packaging and photonics before HBM reaccelerates.
A record quarter with a visible air pocket
Q3 revenue of $669.2 million rose 6.3% sequentially and 48.7% year-on-year, above consensus. “Group quarterly bookings reached a record high at USD 1.13 billion” — Yifan Xu, Chief Financial Officer · 2026-10-27, up 24.7% QoQ and 137.9% YoY, while “Book-to-bill was 1.69, the highest since Q1 2021.” — Yifan Xu, Chief Financial Officer · 2026-10-27 Adjusted gross margin of 42.9% expanded 35 basis points QoQ and 517 basis points YoY, and adjusted EPS of HKD 1.65 beat consensus. The record bookings were broad: TCB set a record, C2S orders hit an all-time high on AI data-center demand, SMT booked a record for the third straight quarter, and photonics set records for both bookings and revenue. Then came the guide. Q4 revenue is expected at $670–730 million, a midpoint of $700 million, up 4.6% QoQ and 37.5% YoY but only modestly above the just-reported quarter. More importantly, “SEMI revenue is expected to be flat due to longer lead times of AP products.” — Bassel Haddad, Group CEO · 2026-10-27 SMT is expected to carry the quarter with double-digit growth. And management explicitly warned that “Q4 booking is expected to be below Q3 record level due to the one-offs and pull-in in SMT.” — Bassel Haddad, Group CEO · 2026-10-27 In other words, the record order quarter included a meaningful amount of bulk order activity and pulled-forward demand; the backlog is real, but the order rate is not necessarily the new run-rate.The HBM pause—and the moving TAM goalpost
The most consequential commentary was on HBM. Management described a stagnation in HBM layer counts and a recalibration of customer investment schedules.That is a reasonable framing, but it is also a change from the prior script. In March, management said “2026 will be a year whereby, there will be new true demand for TCB for 16-high” — Cher Ng, Group Chief Executive Officer (CEO) · 2026-03-04, though it could not give timing. In April, the message was that the “TAM forecast is actually of the $1.6 billion is intact.” — Yifan Xu, Chief Financial Officer · 2026-04-22 Now the mix has moved. Haddad said “the majority of the TCB TAM in the next couple of years would come from logic versus memory -- versus HBM.” — Bassel Haddad, Group CEO · 2026-10-27 That is a meaningful shift from the prior framing, where HBM was described as the larger portion of the TAM until the outer years. In March, CFO Katie Xu said “the memory -- the HBM portion in the TAM definitely is much larger than logic. But as we go out -- a few years out, this dynamic will actually shift” — Yifan Xu, Finance or Financial Officer (likely CFO or similar) · 2026-03-04. The shift appears to be arriving sooner—or at least the company is asking investors to value it sooner. TCB TAM is still expected to expand beyond $1.6 billion by 2028, with the official update due at the Q1 2027 call. The new pillars are logic C2W, silicon bridge integration, and panel level packaging. Panel is still early: sample bonding with a leading advanced logic customer, with “orders to come potentially late '27 with some revenue realization starting with 2028.” — Bassel Haddad, Group CEO · 2026-10-27 Bridge die work with a leading global IDM is in development. The HBM use TCB opportunity has not disappeared—it has been deferred, and the burden of proof has shifted to logic.... we believe what we see in HBM layer count stagnation reflects the industry reassessment of the optimal balance between memory density, bandwidth and thermal. Even though we see larger investments have been pushed out, we believe there will be the need to add capacity and selective upgrades. So all in all, it is an adjustment to the timing rather than a change in the underlying demand.