Open in interactive viewer → charts, metric popovers & call review

Curtiss-Wright's Record Quarter Meets a 45% Drawdown

The operating story got stronger; the stock has already decided the multiple was the problem.
CW · Earnings Call · 2026-11-05

The beat-and-raise after the de-rating

Curtiss-Wright's Q3 2026 print is almost aggressively good. Sales rose 10% to $953 million, operating margin expanded 30 basis points to 19.9%, diluted EPS rose 16% to $3.94, free cash flow was nearly $160 million, and orders increased 15% for a 1.11x book-to-bill. Management raised full-year sales, EPS, and free-cash-flow guidance and pointed to a record backlog of roughly $4.6 billion. “sales of $953 million increased 10% year over year, reflecting overall strong growth across our A and D and commercial markets” — Lynn Bamford, Chair and Chief Executive Officer · 2026-11-05. The tape, however, has already voted. CW is down 42.7% over the last 90 trading days and 45.3% from its July 6 peak. That is not a demand signal. It is a multiple signal. At the last filed quarter the company was still priced at 51.7x trailing net income and 46.6x trailing free cash flow. The operating story got better; the stock's valuation got worse.

Leadership is the new top keyword

The most important new fact on this call is not a product. It is people. The top company keyword is leadership team, and the transcript is full of transitions: Kevin Rayment becomes CEO on January 1, Lynn Bamford moves to Executive Chair, three new segment presidents were named, and Chris Farkas stepped down as CFO with Gary Ogilby serving as Interim CFO. For a company that has spent years selling the durability of its Pivot to Growth strategy, this is a real regime change at the top. Rayment used his first call to defer the strategic update:

I will share more specific details during our Q4 earnings call and provide a more comprehensive overview at our next Investor Day in May 2027.

Kevin Rayment, Chief Executive Officer · 2026-11-05
That is sensible housekeeping, but it is also a vacuum. Analysts asked about 2027 several times; Lynn declined to give specifics, saying she did not want to give Kevin "an early tell." The market can underwrite a known strategy. It has a harder time underwriting a strategy that arrives in May.

The AP1000 order is now a deadline, not an option

The second tension is nuclear. The company has built a credible position: more than $100 million of content on the Rolls-Royce small modular reactor, above $20 million with X-energy, and roughly $110 million-plus per AP1000 plant before incremental content. But the first AP1000 order has been "coming in 2026" for several calls. On this call, Lynn acknowledged the calendar: “We have said the same thing consistently, and we do still expect an order in 2026 and we surely realize where we are in November and that runway is getting shorter.” — Lynn Bamford, Chair and Chief Executive Officer · 2026-11-05 That is not new information; it is the same promise with less runway. In May, she said “we do still expect that order this calendar year” — Lynn Bamford, Chair and Chief Executive Officer · 2026-05-07. The order is still not in guidance. The equity, however, had been paying for it. When a long-dated option gets a date stamp, the market marks it to the calendar.

Defense is doing the work

The offset is that the core defense business is not waiting for anything. Defense Electronics orders rose 27%, tactical communications stabilized, and management expects a strong Q4 sequential ramp. Kevin Rayment said “our bookings have been strong Q2, Q3 and we are running into sort of Q4 with the CR at the December 11th” — Kevin Rayment, Chief Executive Officer · 2026-11-05. The near-term risk is a continuing resolution and a shutdown headline, not lost programs. The prior call made the same point: “I do not believe there is any demand destruction. it is just timing.” — Lynn Bamford, Chair and Chief Executive Officer · 2026-08-06. The current order book supports that. Defense Electronics still runs at industry leading margins, and the company is aligned with the base budget rather than a single supplemental. That is a better place to be than the market's current price implies. The tactical communication equipment line and the record order in the quarter are the proof points.

What the tape is really saying

The macro backdrop matters because CW's premium was built on scarcity: defense growth, nuclear optionality, and power-demand adjacency. The global tape has cracked in the adjacent AI data centers complex, down more than 30% over the last 90 days on broad negative breadth. CW is not a data-center pure play, but its SMR and commercial-nuclear story has been marketed into the same electricity-demand narrative. When that narrative cools, a 50x earnings multiple gets tested. The last filed quarter showed a 21.0% operating margin, and Q3 came in at 19.9%, still up year over year. The business is executing. The stock is de-rating.

Bottom line

Curtiss-Wright is not a broken operating story. It is a high-quality industrial compounder with record orders, a raised guide, and a balance sheet that still supports buybacks and M&A. The 19.6x interest coverage and the raised “free cash flow outlook by $10 million to a new range of $595 million to $615 million” — Gary A. Ogilby, Interim Chief Financial Officer · 2026-11-05 are not signs of stress. But the stock's 45% drawdown says the market is repricing the multiple, not the business. The next catalysts are concrete: a 2027 guide in February, an AP1000 order that either lands or does not, and a Q4 bookings number that proves the CR noise is temporary. If those arrive, the current drawdown may look overdone. If they slip, the de-rating has a way to run.