Endesa's Earnings Are Finally Regulated — And That Is Why the Guidance Won't Move
Half of EBITDA now comes from networks and non-mainland generation; the other half is hostage to an ancillary-services bill nobody can control
ELE.MC · Earnings Call · 2026-10-28
The wires became the business
For most of the last decade Endesa sold itself as an integrated Iberian generator-retailer whose earnings quality was hostage to the pool price. That framing no longer fits. The first nine months of 2026 delivered EBITDA of €4.6 billion (up 8% reported, 13% excluding a €0.2 billion workforce restructuring provision) and net income of €2.0 billion, up 15% — but the composition is what matters. CEO Gianni Armani put it plainly: “EBITDA growth is heavily driven by the contribution of our regulated business with -- which increased from about 40% to approximately 50% of total EBITDA, reflecting the growing weight of network and non-mainland generation and further improving the visibility and predictability of our earnings.” — Gianni Armani, Chief Executive Officer (CEO) · 2026-10-28 Networks EBITDA rose 25% on a gross margin up 20% to €2.2 billion, driven by the new regulatory framework live since January 2026 plus prior-year settlements booked in Q1 and Q3. Grid CapEx jumped 42% to €0.9 billion and the regulated asset base reached €11.3 billion. That is the real re-rating engine — a compounding, regulated asset base rather than a weather bet. The company's own keyword footprint confirms the pivot: this quarter's top themes are firm capacity, non-mainland generation, the capacity market, demand growth and security of supply — the vocabulary of system architecture, not of margin defence. Two quarters ago the same list led with non-mainland generation, retail business and cost-based valuation; the emphasis has migrated from defending margin to designing the system.The volatility tax nobody budgeted for
Offsetting that quality improvement is a cost line that has become structural rather than episodic. On ancillary services, Armani did not soften it:The P&L mechanics are ugly: a roughly €200 million negative on supply, partially offset by about €100 million on thermal generation. Management's answer is regulatory — socialise the cost of system security across all consumers, as Portugal has done — which is an ask, not a result. This is not a new theme, and that is precisely the point. Fifteen months ago the CFO called it “the worst quarter ever, our horribilis quarter” — Marco Palermo, Chief Financial Officer · 2025-07-29 after the blackout-driven spike, and in October 2025 quantified the gross drag at roughly “EUR 75 million per quarter” — Marco Palermo, Chief Financial Officer · 2025-10-29. Five quarters later the number has grown, not normalised. The higher ancillary services burden is now a standing tax on being the largest long retail position in a renewable-heavy grid — and the fix sits with a regulator, not with management.We are experiencing a significant growth in ancillary service cost, 40% up to the end of September. The total amount is above EUR 4 billion, and we forecast at the end of the year between EUR 5.5 billion and EUR 6 billion estimate total cost.