NACCO: A 63% EBITDA Jump, a 31% Stock Slide, and a Solar Exit Nobody Will Price
Dragline contracts, mitigation-bank land and a lithium mine-in-waiting are compounding — but a $158 million net-cash reversal and a wind-down management refuses to size are what the tape is discounting.
NC · Earnings Call · 2026-11-05
The quarter that worked, and the stock that didn't
On the numbers, NACCO's fiscal third quarter was its cleanest in years. Operating profit rose 37% to $9.3 million and consolidated EBITDA climbed 63% year over year and 28% sequentially to $20.4 million, with each reportable segment kicking in more than $7 million. Contract mining revenue excluding reimbursables rose 75%, driven by the ramp of the Palm Beach County dragline services contract. Even the long-troubled Mississippi Lignite mine got a better outcome: “Payments are not yet fully current, but the situation has improved from last quarter.” — John C. Butler Jr., President and CEO · 2026-11-05 And yet the stock has spent the last three months in a single, unbroken slide — down 31.5% over 90 trading days from a July 16 peak of $48.79, a 31.8% drawdown, on a market cap of roughly $251 million. Investors were not waiting for the income statement; they were pricing the cash statement and the solar overhang. Both are real, and only one of them is now bounded.Solar: from "moving ahead" to "multiple paths forward"
The most revealing thing about this call is what management would not quantify. A year ago, an analyst asked directly whether the solar pipeline was still alive, and the answer was unambiguous: “Yes. Yes. We are working pretty diligently right now on getting those projects that are in the pipeline safe harbored for tax credit purposes.” — John Butler, President and CEO · 2025-11-06 By the second quarter of 2026 the plan had inverted to unwinding the projects and exiting, with a $7 million future-cost estimate. This quarter brought another $3.4 million charge tied to terminating a power purchase agreement, recognized as a payable at September 30 and destined to land on the revolver in the fourth quarter — part of roughly $15 million of solar impairment and curtailment booked through the first three quarters. What changed is that "exit" became "optionality." As the CEO put it, “we found that there is multiple paths forward for these that, you know, allow us to work on strategies where we limit our exposure” — John C. Butler Jr., President and CEO · 2026-11-05 — including monetizing other parts of the project that a buyer might still want. That sounds reasonable and it is also unpriceable, a fact management conceded rather than dodged:The relevant keyword in this quarter's own trajectory is certain solar — carefully scoped, deliberately unsized, and now a line item that can swing whether fourth-quarter operating profit beats or misses a comparable prior year.If we thought this was going to be really bad, our outlook would be worse. And if we thought that there was you know, a total bonanza on the backside of this, our outlook would have been really high. So Yeah. You know, we are. We think this is this is something that you know, not a big number either direction. But it is just really. Where we are right now, it is really hard to predict that.