Triple Flag Picks Up the Leverage Key
A quiet 25,000-GEO quarter, a re-rated royalty book — and a CEO who spent two calls saying $4.3 billion was too big now floating a 2x EBITDA balance sheet.
TFPM.TO · Earnings Call · 2026-11-04
The quarter that didn't need a headline
Triple Flag's third quarter was, on the numbers, exactly what the model promises: 25,000 GEOs, putting the year in the top half of the raised 100,000–110,000 GEO range; revenue of $107 million, up 14%; adjusted EBITDA of $94 million, up 22%; and operating cash flow per share of $0.45, up 15% from $0.39. Eban Bari was explicit that this is the metric that matters: “Operating cash flow per share is the metric that most directly compounds shareholders over time.” — Sheldon Vanderkooy, Chief Executive Officer · 2026-11-04 The company repurchased another $20 million of stock in the quarter and paid down $50 million of revolver drawings, exiting with $185 million drawn against $1.1 billion of available liquidity. Note what management would not do: give asset-level guidance. That refusal is asset-by-asset boilerplate now, ranked near the top of the company's keyword list this quarter and in the third quarter of 2025 alike. It is the one part of the call that is pure muscle memory — analysts ask about Ravenswood's run rate, about the 2030 build, about Q4, and get the same polite no.The value-surfacing machine, running on schedule
Where the call actually earned its keep was in the portfolio, and the two big news items of October both landed in Triple Flag's favour without a dollar of new capital. SSR Mining published an updated Marigold technical report — a 20-year life of mine, 4.6 million ounces of net reserve, and a maiden mine plan for Buffalo Valley (670,000 ounces of reserve, first production 2029). Concurrently SSR agreed to buy Rockwell Resources, whose Converse project sits six kilometres from the Marigold Complex, hosts over 2 million indicated and 3 million inferred ounces, and carries first gold expected in 2033 at 150,000–170,000 ounces a year. Triple Flag holds a 3.35% NSR on Buffalo Valley and a 5% NSR on Converse — both bought cheap. James Dendle's framing was the whole investment case in one line: "These are royalties that were acquired at a very modest valuation... At no incremental cost to Triple Flag." The Polo Sur royalty is the same trade in Chile, where Antofagasta is now evaluating folding oxide material into the Centinela plan. And Northparkes is the same trade at larger scale: E48 ramping, E22 block cave in development, E44 gold-dominant material with minimum deliveries from 2030, and a mill study at 10–11 million tonnes per annum against a resource base of more than 630 million tonnes including inferred resources. Sheldon Vanderkooy leaned on a Scotiabank study to make the point that this is not narrative but realised return:That is a fair brag. It is also the setup for the interesting part.At the time we announced our investments, The Street ascribed an average IRR of 4.9%, Now with the benefit of hindsight, Scotiabank ascribes a realized IRR of 12.8% This 12.8% IRR leads our peer group.
The change: the size ceiling came off
In February, answering the same question about billion-dollar royalties that peers were then discussing, Sheldon Vanderkooy was unambiguous: “We have always said that our sweet spot is really in the $200,000,000 to $500,000,000 range... $4,300,000,000 is too big for Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp.” — Sheldon Vanderkooy, Chief Executive Officer · 2026-02-19 He repeated a variant of that in November 2025 and again in August. On this call, pressed by Bank of America's Lawson Winder on how much trailing leverage the company would tolerate "on a short term basis in order to complete a larger transaction," the answer changed shape:He then confirmed to Fahad Tariq that “we would look at larger transactions as well” — Sheldon Vanderkooy, Chief Executive Officer · 2026-11-04 — larger than the mid-size pipeline, not instead of it. The keyword evidence corroborates the shift in framing: large transactions enters this quarter's top tier at number two, having been a background phrase in earlier periods. Management has not committed to anything, and Sheldon immediately hedged with prudence and "not either/or." But the frame moved from we don't swing that big to here is the leverage we could use if we did. With $550 million deployed over the past year against $350 million the year before, and a pipeline he called "very robust," that is a meaningful widening of the addressable deal set.I think if you are at 2x EBITDA, you are in a zone of safety there. And I think the market is comfortable with that. And quite frankly, the cash flow generation of a portfolio like this, that could be de-levered. And so when you start to run those numbers, that actually allows us to look for, you know, quite large transactions that really move the needle.