Open in interactive viewer → charts, metric popovers & call review

Vishay's Record Quarter Meets a 52% Drawdown

Highest revenue in company history, guided to a record December — and the market has cut the stock in half since June
VSH · Earnings Call · 2026-11-04

A record quarter that the tape refuses to buy

On November 4, Vishay did something it had never done: it reported $979 million of quarterly revenue, the highest in its history, up 24% year over year and above the top end of guidance. Gross margin jumped to 25.5%, operating margin to 9.4%, EPS to $0.37, and management guided Q4 to $990 million and a 26.0% gross margin. “At $979 million, we have set a record with the highest quarterly revenue in Vishay's history.” — Joel Smejkal, President and Chief Executive Officer · 2026-11-04 The stock, meanwhile, has been cut in half: down 51.9% over the last 90 trading days and 60.2% from its June peak of $64.85. That is the story. The operating report is not the problem; the tape is.

The operating engine is finally revving

This was not a one-segment AI print. Industrial revenue rose 43% year over year, aerospace and defense 23%, healthcare 13%, automotive 7%. Distribution grew 30% and accounted for 76% of total revenue growth. Book-to-bill was 1.29, backlog reached $2.2 billion, or 6.6 months, and EMS orders hit an all-time high. Passives were 52% of sales, which is the point of Vishay's hybrid model: it sells capacitors and resistors alongside MOSFETs and diodes into the same power architectures. Management put AI revenue near $200 million this year, up from roughly $100 million last year. “AI revenue, last year we were around $100 million. This year we keep pushing to be near $200 million is what our push is.” — Joel Smejkal, President and Chief Executive Officer · 2026-11-04 The AI server demand is real, but it is still a minority of a roughly $3.9 billion annualized revenue base. The broader industrial power and distribution recovery is doing more of the heavy lifting. The customer-language shift is just as important. Vishay spent the last two years being told it was a risk supplier in past upcycles. Now management says customers are saying the opposite, and that is a validated structural change rather than a slogan. The phrase risk supplier is new in the top keyword set and captures why the company is getting more design wins: lead times are competitive, parts are on distributor shelves, and customers are adding Vishay content before the next shortage hits.

From tariff refunds to lead times

A quarter ago, Vishay's top company keyword was tariff refunds, followed by revenue increases and AI-related demand. This quarter, tariff refunds do not even make the top 30. The new top themes are AI server, EMS customers, Itzehoe 12, competitive lead time, AI customers, Korean foundries, engineering wafers, and risk supplier. That is a real narrative rotation: away from balance-sheet and tariff noise, toward capacity conversion and operating leverage. Tariff refunds still show up in the cash-conversion detail — DSO improved partly from tariff-refund credits — but they are no longer a pillar of the equity story. Pricing is another theme that looks new but is not. Vishay has been raising prices since late 2025 on metal costs, and management reminded investors again that increases are still coming in Q4. “We've seen price increases each quarter, and there's still some new price increases coming in the fourth quarter.” — Joel Smejkal, President and Chief Executive Officer · 2026-11-04 The prior May call made the same point: “We started increasing pricing in the fourth quarter of last year, depending on the metal impact product by product.” — Joel Smejkal, President and Chief Executive Officer · 2026-05-13 So the pricing lever is recurring, not a fresh discovery. What is fresh is that volume, mix, and price are now moving together, which is why gross margin expanded more than 200 basis points sequentially.

Structural or cyclical? Management's big claim

The central debate on the call was whether this is just the upcycle or a permanently better Vishay. Joel Smejkal argued for structural:

Structural improvements is a big step here. When we look at gaining customer count, gaining share, putting more products on the customer bill of materials, those are three big things. ... I think a lot of this growth is structural change. We're enjoying the cyclicality of the market and the many market segments that are up, but a majority of this is the change of Vishay's operating approach in 3.0.

Joel Smejkal, President and Chief Executive Officer · 2026-11-04
The Q2 fundamentals show how much ground Vishay had to make up before this print. Revenue was $889 million in the June quarter. Gross margin was 23.3%. Effective net cash was negative $413 million. Capital expenditure was $95 million in the quarter, and free cash flow was only $10 million. Capex was $95 million. Free cash flow was $10 million. Q3 changes that trajectory — $98 million of free cash flow and a 26% gross-margin guide — but one quarter does not prove a structural margin floor. The levers are also multi-year. Itzehoe 12 is landing equipment and targeting non-automotive production in the second half of 2027. Newport is still adding automotive audits and customer program approvals. Backend consolidation is described as a primary margin initiative, but there is still no announcement. “Backend is an important strategy in our margin improvement. ... We hope by the end of the year, we hope to be announcing something.” — Joel Smejkal, President and Chief Executive Officer · 2026-11-04 That is a promise investors have heard before. The structural case is credible, but it is not yet fully de-risked.

The tape is voting on the theme, not the quarter

The global tape explains the disconnect better than the income statement. AI data center exposure has been broadly sold: the global theme is down roughly 21% over 30 days with more than 50 negative tickers, and adjacent themes like high-performance computing and AI-optimized servers are down even more. Vishay is being traded as part of that bucket, not as a diversified industrial and passive recovery. It is not alone: the recent reporter list includes AMD, ALAB, AEIS, and ETN, all talking data centers and AI power. The theme is shared, so the multiple compression is shared. The irony is that Vishay's AI revenue is small relative to its industrial, auto, aerospace, and healthcare base. If the market were pricing the quarter, the stock would be up. If it is pricing an AI infrastructure unwind, the stock's drawdown makes more sense. The company can grow into the theme; the theme just stopped paying for exposure.

What would make the record stick

The near-term evidence is still favorable. Backlog coverage is 6.6 months, customers are placing orders up to 18 months out, and distributor inventory is flat at 18 weeks globally — 12 weeks in Asia — even as consumption rises. Management says it still cannot see meaningful double ordering, echoing the prior call: “I think at this point, it's still fairly rational. ... At this point, we say we're early. We're early in this upcycle.” — Joel Smejkal, President and Chief Executive Officer · 2026-08-05 The prior AI demand comment was similarly constructive: “Demand -- yes, demand for AI is growing with the hybrid model of semis and passives. We're getting more and more passives on the bill of materials.” — Joel Smejkal, President and Chief Executive Officer · 2026-08-05 The risks are equally clear. Automotive is guided flat next quarter. Memory supply could distort customer builds. Free cash flow for the full year is guided close to break-even because of the receivables securitization reduction and capacity spending. And the stock has already voted that the cycle is peaking, even as the company guides to a record December quarter. The next proof points are a backend announcement, Itzehoe 12 wafer timing, Newport program approvals, and whether book-to-bill stays above 1.0 into 2027. For now, Vishay is a genuine operating inflection colliding with a violent de-rating of AI infrastructure equities. The record quarter is real. The 52% drawdown is also real. The investment question is whether Vishay 3.0 is structural enough to grow into a market that just cut its multiple in half.